Back to results

Armadale vs Rockingham — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Armadale

    WA · 6112
    65Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Rockingham

    WA · 6168
    64Strong
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    11.4%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Armadale
Rockingham
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.8%/yr
10011.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
522.6%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4545% under cap
4141% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Armadale

    1/8
    • Affordability

  2. Rockingham

    1/8
    • Rental yield

Why Armadale

Stable entry · room to scale

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Rockingham

Stable entry · room to scale

11.4%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.4%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state