Belconnen vs Macgregor vs Holt — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

Belconnen
ACT · 2617
54Average
Median
$845k
5y growth
7.2%/yr
BalancedStable entry point
Macgregor
ACT · 2615
60Strong
Median
$695k
5y growth
8.2%/yr
BalancedStable entry point
Holt
ACT · 2615
57Average
Median
$745k
5y growth
7.8%/yr
GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight

Belconnen

Macgregor

Holt

Capital growth (5y)

weight 22%

727.2%/yr

828.2%/yr

787.8%/yr

Rental yield

weight 13%

532.6%

693.5%

552.8%

Rental demand

weight 10%

651.4%

Population growth

weight 12%

919.1%

Income growth

weight 12%

6416.0%

Construction pipeline

weight 15%

0–

Affordability

weight 8%

1616% under cap

3131% under cap

2626% under cap

Supply tightening

weight 8%

65-3.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

Belconnen
0/8
No outright lead on any single dimension.
Macgregor
3/8
- Capital growth (5y)
- Rental yield
- Affordability
Holt
0/8
No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Belconnen

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 7.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers

Population growth+9.1% (5y)
Capital growth7.2%/yr
Tight rentals1.4%
Supply tightening-3.0% YoY

Risks

No major construction project in this state

Why Macgregor

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 8.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers

Population growth+9.1% (5y)
Capital growth8.2%/yr
Rental yield3.5%
Tight rentals1.4%

Risks

No major construction project in this state

Why Holt

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 7.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers

Population growth+9.1% (5y)
Capital growth7.8%/yr
Tight rentals1.4%
Supply tightening-3.0% YoY

Risks

No major construction project in this state