Back to results

Bonnie Brook vs Bradfield — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bonnie Brook

    VIC · 3335
    62Strong
    Median
    $660k
    5y growth
    16.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Bradfield

    NSW · 2556
    58Average
    Median
    $1.00M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bonnie Brook
Bradfield
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10016.5%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
603.0%
804.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
651.4%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
61$3.0bn
Affordability
weight 8%
3434% under cap
0Over cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bonnie Brook

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Bradfield

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Construction pipeline

Why Bonnie Brook

Stable entry point

16.5%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 6.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth16.5%/yr
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub18.4 kmApproved · 2033

Why Bradfield

Stable but fully priced

4.0% gross yield, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.0%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport4.1 kmConstruction · 2026