Back to results

Bradfield vs Joondalup — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bradfield

    NSW · 2556
    58Average
    Median
    $1.00M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable but fully priced

  2. Joondalup

    WA · 6027
    63Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bradfield
Joondalup
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
804.0%
502.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
61$3.0bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
0Over cap
2626% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bradfield

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Joondalup

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability

Why Bradfield

Stable but fully priced

4.0% gross yield, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.0%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport4.1 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Joondalup

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state