Back to results

Carseldine vs Aspley — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Carseldine

    QLD · 4034
    65Strong
    Median
    $895k
    5y growth
    12.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Aspley

    QLD · 4034
    64Strong
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    11.5%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Carseldine
Aspley
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10012.2%/yr
10011.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
512.5%
462.3%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
7619.0%
7619.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1010% under cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
90-8.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Carseldine

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Aspley

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Carseldine

Stable entry point

12.2%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth12.2%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street13.1 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Aspley

Stable but fully priced

11.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.3%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street11.1 kmConstruction · 2026