Back to results

Claremont vs Wodonga — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Claremont

    TAS · 7011
    50Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    7.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Wodonga

    VIC · 3689
    63Strong
    Median
    $485k
    5y growth
    7.9%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Claremont
Wodonga
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
787.8%/yr
797.9%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
603.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
8822.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0$0.0bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4141% under cap
5252% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Claremont

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Wodonga

    7/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Claremont

Stable entry · room to scale

7.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY. Plenty of room under your cap if you want to stretch.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge4.9 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Wodonga

Stable entry · room to scale

listings tightening 8.0% YoY, incomes +22.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+22.0% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.9%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·North East Link — Bulleen243.4 kmConstruction · 2028