Back to results

Gungahlin vs Holt — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Gungahlin

    ACT · 2912
    58Average
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Holt

    ACT · 2615
    57Average
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    7.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Gungahlin
Holt
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
828.2%/yr
787.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
552.8%
552.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
919.1%
919.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
6817.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1616% under cap
2626% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
65-3.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Gungahlin

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Holt

    1/8
    • Affordability

Why Gungahlin

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 8.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Income growth+17.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Holt

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 7.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.4%
  • Supply tightening-3.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state