Back to results

Joondanna vs Logan Central — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Joondanna

    WA · 6060
    62Strong
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    9.4%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Logan Central

    QLD · 4114
    65Strong
    Median
    $575k
    5y growth
    9.4%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Joondanna
Logan Central
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
949.4%/yr
949.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
361.8%
512.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
751.0%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
7218.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
66% under cap
4343% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
95-9.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Joondanna

    2/8
    • Rental demand
    • Supply tightening

  2. Logan Central

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Joondanna

Stable but fully priced

population +12.6% (5y), listings tightening 9.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-9.0% YoY
  • Capital growth9.4%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.0%
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.8%)

Why Logan Central

Stable entry · room to scale

population +10.0% (5y), 9.4%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road17.9 kmConstruction · 2026