Back to results

Lauderdale vs Midway Point — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Lauderdale

    TAS · 7021
    45Average
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    6.2%/yr
    BalancedGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Midway Point

    TAS · 7171
    48Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Lauderdale
Midway Point
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
626.2%/yr
707.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
502.5%
603.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1616% under cap
3636% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Lauderdale

    2/8
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Midway Point

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Lauderdale

Growth-led, low cashflow

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, tight 1.3% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Capital growth6.2%/yr
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.5%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Macquarie Point Stadium12.5 kmPlanned · 2029

Why Midway Point

Stable entry point

7.0%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.0%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Macquarie Point Stadium18.6 kmPlanned · 2029