Back to results

Oxley Vale vs Liverpool — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Oxley Vale

    NSW · 2340
    50Average
    Median
    $620k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Liverpool

    NSW · 2170
    52Average
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    8.4%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Oxley Vale
Liverpool
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
848.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
412.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3838% under cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Oxley Vale

    4/8
    • Rental yield
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Liverpool

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

Why Oxley Vale

Stable entry point

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, tight 1.3% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Income growth+16.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta307.8 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Liverpool

Stable but fully priced

8.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta13.8 kmConstruction · 2030