Back to results

Palmerston vs Footscray — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Palmerston

    NT · 0830
    54Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    5.8%/yr
    YieldStable entry · room to scale

  2. Footscray

    VIC · 3011
    69Strong
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    7.1%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Palmerston
Footscray
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
585.8%/yr
717.1%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
1006.2%
392.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
8421.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
100$5.2bn
Affordability
weight 8%
4545% under cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
500.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Palmerston

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Footscray

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

Why Palmerston

Stable entry · room to scale

6.2% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield6.2%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Footscray

Stable but fully priced

$5.2bn pipeline incl. West Gate Tunnel, listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$5.2bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)

Construction ·New Footscray Hospital0.0 kmConstruction · 2026