Back to results

Palona vs Liverpool — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Palona

    NSW · 2232
    49Average
    Median
    $1.00M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable but fully priced

  2. Liverpool

    NSW · 2170
    52Average
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    8.4%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Palona
Liverpool
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
848.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
804.0%
412.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
0Over cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Palona

    1/8
    • Rental yield

  2. Liverpool

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Affordability

Why Palona

Stable but fully priced

4.0% gross yield, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.0%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·WestConnex M4–M5 Link20.3 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Liverpool

Stable but fully priced

8.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta13.8 kmConstruction · 2030