Back to results

Port Hacking vs Bradfield — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Port Hacking

    NSW · 2229
    49Average
    Median
    $1.00M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable but fully priced

  2. Bradfield

    NSW · 2556
    58Average
    Median
    $1.00M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Port Hacking
Bradfield
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
834.1%
804.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
61$3.0bn
Affordability
weight 8%
0Over cap
0Over cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Port Hacking

    1/8
    • Rental yield

  2. Bradfield

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

Why Port Hacking

Stable but fully priced

4.1% gross yield, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.1%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·WestConnex M4–M5 Link17.9 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Bradfield

Stable but fully priced

4.0% gross yield, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.0%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport4.1 kmConstruction · 2026