Back to results

Seddon vs Tuart Hill — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Seddon

    VIC · 3011
    55Average
    Median
    $965k
    5y growth
    0.1%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Tuart Hill

    WA · 6060
    64Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Seddon
Tuart Hill
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10.1%/yr
989.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
502.5%
392.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
751.0%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
8421.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
100$6.8bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
44% under cap
1616% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
95-9.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Seddon

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Tuart Hill

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Seddon

Stable but fully priced

$6.8bn pipeline incl. West Gate Tunnel, listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$6.8bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (97% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.5%)

Construction ·New Footscray Hospital1.0 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Tuart Hill

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +12.6% (5y), 9.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-9.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.0%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)
  • No major construction project in this state