Back to results

Hamilton Hill vs Geebung — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Hamilton Hill

    WA · 6163
    62Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Geebung

    QLD · 4034
    65Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Hamilton Hill
Geebung
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
989.8%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
392.0%
512.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
6817.0%
7619.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1616% under cap
1616% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Hamilton Hill

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Geebung

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Hamilton Hill

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +12.6% (5y), 9.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.1%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Geebung

Stable entry point

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street12.6 kmConstruction · 2026