Back to results

Woden vs Tuggeranong — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.00Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Woden

    ACT · 2606
    54Average
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    6.8%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Tuggeranong

    ACT · 2900
    57Average
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    7.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Woden
Tuggeranong
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
686.8%/yr
787.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
603.0%
683.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
919.1%
919.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
66% under cap
2626% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
65-3.0% YoY
60-2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Woden

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Tuggeranong

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Woden

Stable but fully priced

population +9.1% (5y), 6.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth6.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Supply tightening-3.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Tuggeranong

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 7.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.8%/yr
  • Rental yield3.4%
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state