Back to results

Bradfield vs Yenabilli — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bradfield

    NSW · 2556
    59Average
    Median
    $1.00M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable entry point

  2. Yenabilli

    NSW · 2232
    50Average
    Median
    $1.00M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bradfield
Yenabilli
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
804.0%
804.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
61$3.0bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1717% under cap
1717% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bradfield

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Yenabilli

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Bradfield

Stable entry point

4.0% gross yield, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.0%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport4.1 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Yenabilli

Stable entry point

4.0% gross yield, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.0%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·WestConnex M4–M5 Link20.3 kmRecently completed · 2024