Back to results

Bunbury vs Mullaloo — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bunbury

    WA · 6230
    54Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~4k residents

  2. Mullaloo

    WA · 6027
    61Strong
    Median
    $1.09M
    5y growth
    9.4%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bunbury
Mullaloo
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
989.8%/yr
949.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
633.1%
452.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
751.0%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6817.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
5555% under cap
99% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bunbury

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Mullaloo

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Bunbury

Thin market · ~4k residents

population +12.6% (5y), 9.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Rental yield3.1%
  • Income growth+15.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 3,948 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Mullaloo

Stable but fully priced

population +12.6% (5y), 9.4%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.4%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.0%
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)