Back to results

Calamvale vs Noarlunga — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Calamvale

    QLD · 4116
    64Strong
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    12.4%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Noarlunga

    SA · 5168
    65Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Calamvale
Noarlunga
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10012.4%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
452.3%
884.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
7218.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2121% under cap
5555% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Calamvale

    3/8
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Noarlunga

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Calamvale

Growth-led, low cashflow

12.4%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth12.4%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.3%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road14.7 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Noarlunga

Stable entry · room to scale

10.8%/yr capital growth, 4.4% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state