Back to results

Chermside vs Joondalup — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Chermside

    QLD · 4032
    65Strong
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Joondalup

    WA · 6027
    64Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Chermside
Joondalup
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.8%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
412.0%
502.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
7619.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2121% under cap
3838% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
90-8.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Chermside

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Joondalup

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Chermside

Growth-led, low cashflow

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street9.1 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Joondalup

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state