Back to results

Curtin vs Bonython — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Curtin

    ACT · 2605
    50Average
    Median
    $1.15M
    5y growth
    6.2%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Bonython

    ACT · 2905
    58Average
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    7.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Curtin
Bonython
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
626.2%/yr
787.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
412.0%
623.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
919.1%
919.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
55% under cap
3838% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
65-3.0% YoY
60-2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Curtin

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Bonython

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Curtin

Stable but fully priced

population +9.1% (5y), tight 1.3% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Supply tightening-3.0% YoY
  • Income growth+16.0% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)

Why Bonython

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 7.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.4%
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state