Back to results

Deanside vs Geebung — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Deanside

    VIC · 3336
    64Strong
    Median
    $660k
    5y growth
    14.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Geebung

    QLD · 4034
    67Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Deanside
Geebung
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10014.5%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
633.2%
512.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
651.4%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
7619.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4545% under cap
3030% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Deanside

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Geebung

    4/8
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Deanside

Stable entry · room to scale

14.5%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 6.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth14.5%/yr
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub16.5 kmApproved · 2033

Why Geebung

Stable entry point

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street12.6 kmConstruction · 2026