Back to results

Footscray vs Baldivis — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Footscray

    VIC · 3011
    70Strong
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    7.1%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Baldivis

    WA · 6171
    66Strong
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    12.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Footscray
Baldivis
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
717.1%/yr
10012.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
392.0%
582.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
8421.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
100$5.2bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2121% under cap
4646% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Footscray

    3/8
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Baldivis

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

Why Footscray

Stable entry point

$5.2bn pipeline incl. West Gate Tunnel, listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$5.2bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)

Construction ·New Footscray Hospital0.0 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Baldivis

Stable entry · room to scale

12.2%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth12.2%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state