Back to results

Kingsville vs Noarlunga — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Kingsville

    VIC · 3012
    52Average
    Median
    $1.03M
    5y growth
    0.4%/yr
    BalancedLate-cycle hold

  2. Noarlunga

    SA · 5168
    65Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Kingsville
Noarlunga
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
40.4%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
361.8%
884.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
651.4%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
100$6.0bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1414% under cap
5555% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Kingsville

    4/8
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Noarlunga

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Affordability

Why Kingsville

Late-cycle hold

$6.0bn pipeline incl. West Gate Tunnel, listings tightening 6.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$6.0bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.8%)
  • Modest 5y growth (0.4%/yr)

Construction ·West Gate Tunnel1.2 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Noarlunga

Stable entry · room to scale

10.8%/yr capital growth, 4.4% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state