Back to results

Lota vs Birtinya — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Lota

    QLD · 4179
    61Strong
    Median
    $1.15M
    5y growth
    11.5%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Birtinya

    QLD · 4575
    60Strong
    Median
    $1.15M
    5y growth
    12.2%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Lota
Birtinya
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.5%/yr
10012.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
381.9%
452.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
6817.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
55% under cap
55% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
65-3.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Lota

    2/8
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Birtinya

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand

Why Lota

Stable but fully priced

11.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.2%
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.9%)

Construction ·Brisbane 2032 Olympics Precinct16.1 kmPlanned · 2032

Why Birtinya

Stable but fully priced

12.2%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth12.2%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.1%
  • Supply tightening-3.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street80.4 kmConstruction · 2026