Back to results

Lota vs Springfield Lakes — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Lota

    QLD · 4179
    61Strong
    Median
    $1.15M
    5y growth
    11.5%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Springfield Lakes

    QLD · 4300
    67Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    13.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Lota
Springfield Lakes
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.5%/yr
10013.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
381.9%
572.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
6817.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
55% under cap
3838% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Lota

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Springfield Lakes

    4/8
    • Rental yield
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Lota

Stable but fully priced

11.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.2%
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.9%)

Construction ·Brisbane 2032 Olympics Precinct16.1 kmPlanned · 2032

Why Springfield Lakes

Stable entry point

13.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth13.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road22.7 kmConstruction · 2026