Back to results

Mandurah vs Deanside — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Mandurah

    WA · 6210
    60Strong
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    11.2%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Deanside

    VIC · 3336
    64Strong
    Median
    $660k
    5y growth
    14.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Mandurah
Deanside
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.2%/yr
10014.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
472.4%
633.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
5050% under cap
4545% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
80-6.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Mandurah

    2/8
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

  2. Deanside

    4/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Mandurah

Growth-led, low cashflow

11.2%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.2%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Income growth+15.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.4%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Deanside

Stable entry · room to scale

14.5%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 6.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth14.5%/yr
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub16.5 kmApproved · 2033