Back to results

Marion vs Elizabeth — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Marion

    SA · 5043
    56Average
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    9.2%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Elizabeth

    SA · 5112
    61Strong
    Median
    $445k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Marion
Elizabeth
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
929.2%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
442.2%
542.7%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3030% under cap
6363% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Marion

    2/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth

  2. Elizabeth

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Marion

Growth-led, low cashflow

9.2%/yr capital growth, tight 1.2% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.2%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Elizabeth

Stable entry · room to scale

11.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state