Back to results

Hamilton Hill vs Ardross — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Hamilton Hill

    WA · 6163
    63Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Ardross

    WA · 6153
    59Average
    Median
    $1.15M
    5y growth
    8.4%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Hamilton Hill
Ardross
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
989.8%/yr
848.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
392.0%
432.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6817.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3030% under cap
55% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Hamilton Hill

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Affordability

  2. Ardross

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Hamilton Hill

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +12.6% (5y), 9.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.1%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Ardross

Stable but fully priced

population +12.6% (5y), listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Capital growth8.4%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.1%
Risks
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.1%)