Back to results

Wynnum vs Tingalpa — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.20Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Wynnum

    QLD · 4178
    61Strong
    Median
    $1.09M
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Tingalpa

    QLD · 4173
    62Strong
    Median
    $1.04M
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Wynnum
Tingalpa
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.8%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
381.9%
422.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
6817.0%
6817.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
99% under cap
1313% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
80-6.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Wynnum

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Tingalpa

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Wynnum

Stable but fully priced

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.2%
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.9%)

Construction ·Brisbane 2032 Olympics Precinct13.8 kmPlanned · 2032

Why Tingalpa

Growth-led, low cashflow

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.2%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.1%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Brisbane 2032 Olympics Precinct6.6 kmPlanned · 2032