Back to results

Albion vs Woolloongabba — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Albion

    QLD · 4010
    67Strong
    Median
    $1.25M
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Woolloongabba

    QLD · 4102
    76Standout
    Median
    $1.40M
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Albion
Woolloongabba
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
10010.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
643.2%
331.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
7619.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0$0.0bn
100$13.2bn
Affordability
weight 8%
1717% under cap
77% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
90-8.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Albion

    5/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Woolloongabba

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

Why Albion

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street4.5 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Woolloongabba

Stable but fully priced

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Infrastructure pipeline$13.2bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (93% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Woolloongabba0.0 kmConstruction · 2026