Back to results

Annerley vs Geebung — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Annerley

    QLD · 4103
    68Strong
    Median
    $1.15M
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Geebung

    QLD · 4034
    68Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Annerley
Geebung
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
331.6%
512.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
7218.0%
7619.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
37$1.9bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2424% under cap
4444% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Annerley

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Geebung

    5/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Annerley

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road1.5 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Geebung

Stable entry · room to scale

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street12.6 kmConstruction · 2026