Back to results

Bakewell vs Forest Lake — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bakewell

    NT · 0832
    51Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    5.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

  2. Forest Lake

    QLD · 4078
    68Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    12.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bakewell
Forest Lake
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
585.8%/yr
10012.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
663.3%
542.7%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
6060% under cap
5050% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
500.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bakewell

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Forest Lake

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Bakewell

Stable entry · room to scale

population +7.1% (5y), 3.3% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.3%
  • Budget headroom60% under cap
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Forest Lake

Stable entry · room to scale

12.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth12.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road15.8 kmConstruction · 2026