Back to results

Bracken Ridge vs Chermside — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bracken Ridge

    QLD · 4017
    68Strong
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    12.4%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Chermside

    QLD · 4032
    66Strong
    Median
    $945k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bracken Ridge
Chermside
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10012.4%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
502.5%
412.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
7619.0%
7619.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4444% under cap
3737% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
90-8.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bracken Ridge

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Chermside

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Bracken Ridge

Stable entry · room to scale

12.4%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth12.4%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street16.5 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Chermside

Growth-led, low cashflow

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street9.1 kmConstruction · 2026