Back to results

Braddon vs Kingston — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Braddon

    ACT · 2612
    51Average
    Median
    $1.40M
    5y growth
    6.2%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Kingston

    ACT · 2604
    50Average
    Median
    $1.40M
    5y growth
    5.4%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Braddon
Kingston
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
626.2%/yr
545.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
371.8%
381.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
919.1%
919.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
7218.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
77% under cap
77% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Braddon

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

  2. Kingston

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand

Why Braddon

Stable but fully priced

population +9.1% (5y), incomes +18.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • At top of budget (93% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.8%)

Why Kingston

Stable but fully priced

population +9.1% (5y), tight 1.1% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.1%
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (93% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.9%)