Back to results

Brighton vs Greenslopes — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Brighton

    TAS · 7030
    54Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

  2. Greenslopes

    QLD · 4120
    66Strong
    Median
    $1.20M
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Brighton
Greenslopes
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
828.2%/yr
10010.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
673.3%
321.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
1$0.1bn
23$1.1bn
Affordability
weight 8%
6464% under cap
2020% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Brighton

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Greenslopes

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

Why Brighton

Stable entry · room to scale

8.2%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY. Plenty of room under your cap if you want to stretch.

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Rental yield3.3%
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge3.6 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Greenslopes

Stable entry point

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road1.9 kmConstruction · 2026