Back to results

Bulleen vs Belgrave South — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bulleen

    VIC · 3105
    58Average
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    3.4%/yr
    BalancedLate-cycle hold

  2. Belgrave South

    VIC · 3160
    59Average
    Median
    $1.09M
    5y growth
    10.4%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bulleen
Belgrave South
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
343.4%/yr
10010.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
371.8%
432.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
651.4%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
100$9.8bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1313% under cap
2727% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bulleen

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Belgrave South

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Bulleen

Late-cycle hold

$9.8bn pipeline incl. North East Link — Bulleen, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$9.8bn nearby
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.8%)
  • Modest 5y growth (3.4%/yr)

Construction ·North East Link — Bulleen1.1 kmConstruction · 2028

Why Belgrave South

Growth-led, low cashflow

10.4%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.4%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.1%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Glen Waverley18.0 kmConstruction · 2035