Clayton vs South Brisbane — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

Clayton
VIC · 3168
66Strong
Median
$1.25M
5y growth
7.1%/yr
GrowthStable entry point
South Brisbane
QLD · 4101
71Strong
Median
$1.50M
5y growth
9.4%/yr
GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight

Clayton

South Brisbane

Capital growth (5y)

weight 22%

717.1%/yr

949.4%/yr

Rental yield

weight 13%

331.7%

331.6%

Rental demand

weight 10%

681.3%

701.2%

Population growth

weight 12%

787.8%

10010.0%

Income growth

weight 12%

6416.0%

7218.0%

Construction pipeline

weight 15%

100$5.0bn

75$3.8bn

Affordability

weight 8%

1717% under cap

00% under cap

Supply tightening

weight 8%

80-6.0% YoY

85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

Clayton
3/8
- Rental yield
- Construction pipeline
- Affordability
South Brisbane
5/8
- Capital growth (5y)
- Rental demand
- Population growth
- Income growth
- Supply tightening

Why Clayton

Stable entry point

$5.0bn pipeline incl. Suburban Rail Loop East — Clayton, listings tightening 6.0% YoY.

Drivers

Infrastructure pipeline$5.0bn nearby
Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Capital growth7.1%/yr

Risks

Thin gross yield (1.7%)

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Clayton0.0 kmConstruction · 2035

Why South Brisbane

Stable but fully priced

population +10.0% (5y), 9.4%/yr capital growth.

Drivers

Population growth+10.0% (5y)
Capital growth9.4%/yr
Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
Infrastructure pipeline$3.8bn nearby

Risks

At top of budget (100% of cap)
Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Brisbane Metro1.0 kmConstruction · 2025