Back to results

Currambine vs Highgate — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Currambine

    WA · 6028
    66Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    11.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Highgate

    WA · 6003
    62Strong
    Median
    $1.20M
    5y growth
    8.8%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Currambine
Highgate
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10011.2%/yr
888.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
321.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
8421.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
5050% under cap
2020% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Currambine

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Highgate

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Currambine

Stable entry · room to scale

11.2%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.2%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Highgate

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +12.6% (5y), listings tightening 8.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Capital growth8.8%/yr
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)
  • No major construction project in this state