Back to results

Greenslopes vs Clayton — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Greenslopes

    QLD · 4120
    66Strong
    Median
    $1.20M
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Clayton

    VIC · 3168
    66Strong
    Median
    $1.25M
    5y growth
    7.1%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Greenslopes
Clayton
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.5%/yr
717.1%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
321.6%
331.7%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
7218.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
23$1.1bn
100$5.0bn
Affordability
weight 8%
2020% under cap
1717% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
80-6.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Greenslopes

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Clayton

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline

Why Greenslopes

Stable entry point

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road1.9 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Clayton

Stable entry point

$5.0bn pipeline incl. Suburban Rail Loop East — Clayton, listings tightening 6.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$5.0bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.1%/yr
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.7%)

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Clayton0.0 kmConstruction · 2035