Back to results

Greenslopes vs Currambine — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Greenslopes

    QLD · 4120
    66Strong
    Median
    $1.20M
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Currambine

    WA · 6028
    66Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    11.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Greenslopes
Currambine
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.5%/yr
10011.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
321.6%
562.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
7218.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
23$1.1bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2020% under cap
5050% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Greenslopes

    3/8
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Currambine

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Greenslopes

Stable entry point

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road1.9 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Currambine

Stable entry · room to scale

11.2%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.2%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state