Back to results

Homebush vs Annerley — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Homebush

    NSW · 2140
    59Average
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Annerley

    QLD · 4103
    68Strong
    Median
    $1.15M
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Homebush
Annerley
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
381.9%
331.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
92$4.6bn
37$1.9bn
Affordability
weight 8%
1313% under cap
2424% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Homebush

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Annerley

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Homebush

Stable entry point

$4.6bn pipeline incl. Sydney Metro West — Olympic Park, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$4.6bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.9%)

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Olympic Park1.7 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Annerley

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+18.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road1.5 kmConstruction · 2026