Back to results

Homebush South vs Bulleen — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Homebush South

    NSW · 2140
    64Strong
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable entry point

  2. Bulleen

    VIC · 3105
    58Average
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    3.4%/yr
    BalancedLate-cycle hold

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Homebush South
Bulleen
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
343.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
763.8%
371.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
92$4.6bn
100$9.8bn
Affordability
weight 8%
1313% under cap
1313% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Homebush South

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Affordability

  2. Bulleen

    2/8
    • Population growth
    • Construction pipeline

Why Homebush South

Stable entry point

$4.6bn pipeline incl. Sydney Metro West — Olympic Park, 3.8% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$4.6bn nearby
  • Rental yield3.8%
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Olympic Park1.7 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Bulleen

Late-cycle hold

$9.8bn pipeline incl. North East Link — Bulleen, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$9.8bn nearby
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.8%)
  • Modest 5y growth (3.4%/yr)

Construction ·North East Link — Bulleen1.1 kmConstruction · 2028