Back to results

Kelvin Grove vs Albion — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Kelvin Grove

    QLD · 4059
    65Strong
    Median
    $1.25M
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Albion

    QLD · 4010
    67Strong
    Median
    $1.25M
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Kelvin Grove
Albion
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
989.8%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
331.7%
643.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
731.1%
Population growth
weight 12%
10010.0%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
8020.0%
7619.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
18$0.9bn
0$0.0bn
Affordability
weight 8%
1717% under cap
1717% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
90-8.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Kelvin Grove

    2/8
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Albion

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Supply tightening

Why Kelvin Grove

Stable entry point

population +10.0% (5y), 9.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Income growth+20.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.7%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street2.1 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Albion

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Income growth+19.0% (5y)
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Roma Street4.5 kmConstruction · 2026