Back to results

Leederville vs Baldivis — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Leederville

    WA · 6007
    60Strong
    Median
    $1.34M
    5y growth
    8.5%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Baldivis

    WA · 6171
    66Strong
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    12.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Leederville
Baldivis
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
858.5%/yr
10012.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
331.7%
582.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
731.1%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
8421.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1010% under cap
5757% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
90-8.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Leederville

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Baldivis

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Leederville

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +12.6% (5y), listings tightening 8.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-8.0% YoY
  • Capital growth8.5%/yr
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.7%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Baldivis

Stable entry · room to scale

12.2%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth12.2%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state