Logan Central vs Homebush — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

Logan Central
QLD · 4114
67Strong
Median
$575k
5y growth
9.4%/yr
GrowthStable entry · room to scale
Homebush
NSW · 2140
59Average
Median
$1.30M
5y growth
5.0%/yr
BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight

Logan Central

Homebush

Capital growth (5y)

weight 22%

949.4%/yr

505.0%/yr

Rental yield

weight 13%

512.5%

381.9%

Rental demand

weight 10%

701.2%

681.3%

Population growth

weight 12%

10010.0%

656.5%

Income growth

weight 12%

7218.0%

6416.0%

Construction pipeline

weight 15%

0–

92$4.6bn

Affordability

weight 8%

6262% under cap

1313% under cap

Supply tightening

weight 8%

85-7.0% YoY

75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

Logan Central
7/8
- Capital growth (5y)
- Rental yield
- Rental demand
- Population growth
- Income growth
- Affordability
- Supply tightening
Homebush
1/8
- Construction pipeline

Why Logan Central

Stable entry · room to scale

population +10.0% (5y), 9.4%/yr capital growth.

Drivers

Population growth+10.0% (5y)
Capital growth9.4%/yr
Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
Income growth+18.0% (5y)

Risks

No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Boggo Road17.9 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Homebush

Stable entry point

$4.6bn pipeline incl. Sydney Metro West — Olympic Park, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers

Infrastructure pipeline$4.6bn nearby
Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
Tight rentals1.3%
Population growth+6.5% (5y)

Risks

Thin gross yield (1.9%)

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Olympic Park1.7 kmConstruction · 2030