Back to results

Mays Hill vs Heidelberg — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Mays Hill

    NSW · 2145
    60Strong
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Heidelberg

    VIC · 3084
    64Strong
    Median
    $1.29M
    5y growth
    5.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Mays Hill
Heidelberg
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
585.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
351.7%
321.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6817.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
100$11.1bn
100$6.1bn
Affordability
weight 8%
1313% under cap
1414% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Mays Hill

    1/8
    • Rental yield

  2. Heidelberg

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Mays Hill

Stable entry point

$11.1bn pipeline incl. Sydney Metro West — Parramatta, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$11.1bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.7%)

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta1.3 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Heidelberg

Stable entry point

$6.1bn pipeline incl. North East Link — Bulleen, listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$6.1bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Income growth+17.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·North East Link — Bulleen2.0 kmConstruction · 2028