Back to results

Menangle Park vs Undercliffe — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Menangle Park

    NSW · 2563
    54Average
    Median
    $680k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable entry · room to scale

  2. Undercliffe

    NSW · 2206
    56Average
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Menangle Park
Undercliffe
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
763.8%
221.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
85$4.2bn
Affordability
weight 8%
5555% under cap
1313% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Menangle Park

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Undercliffe

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

Why Menangle Park

Stable entry · room to scale

3.8% gross yield, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.8%
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport24.8 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Undercliffe

Stable entry point

$4.2bn pipeline incl. WestConnex M4–M5 Link, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$4.2bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.1%)

Construction ·WestConnex M4–M5 Link2.0 kmRecently completed · 2024