Back to results

Midland vs Box Hill — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Midland

    WA · 6056
    67Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Box Hill

    VIC · 3128
    61Strong
    Median
    $1.50M
    5y growth
    5.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Midland
Box Hill
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.5%/yr
585.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
271.3%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
100$5.0bn
Affordability
weight 8%
6464% under cap
00% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Midland

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

  2. Box Hill

    2/8
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

Why Midland

Stable entry · room to scale

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Box Hill

Stable but fully priced

$5.0bn pipeline incl. Suburban Rail Loop East — Box Hill, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$5.0bn nearby
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.3%)

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Box Hill0.0 kmConstruction · 2035