Back to results

Millner vs Alice Springs — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Millner

    NT · 0810
    46Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry · room to scale

  2. Alice Springs

    NT · 0870
    23Below trend
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    4.4%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~0.2k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Millner
Alice Springs
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
484.8%/yr
444.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
593.0%
603.0%
Rental demand
weight 10%
452.2%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
717.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
4010.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
6060% under cap
6464% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
45+1.0% YoY
30+4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Millner

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Alice Springs

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Millner

Stable entry · room to scale

population +7.1% (5y), 60% under your cap.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Budget headroom60% under cap
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Alice Springs

Thin market · ~0.2k residents

population +7.1% (5y), 64% under your cap.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Budget headroom64% under cap
Risks
  • Only 231 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state